People ex rel. Z.B.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentSabers, Justice
[¶ 30.] Z.B. argues that SDCL 22-24B-2 is unconstitutional because it violates his rights to due process.10 The State claims *606that due process concerns are not implicated because the statute must infringe on a liberty interest and Z.B.’s interest in his reputation alone is insufficient. Moreover, the majority asserts that this issue should not even be considered by this Court. Whether a statute requiring a juvenile to register as a sex offender violates due process is a question of first impression in South Dakota. Therefore, this analysis is important in providing guidance to the Legislature…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.