Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Mueller

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 14, 1944PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tlte opinion of the court was delivered by

Brogan, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit. The complaint charged the defendant with malicious prosecution. In our review of the testimony in the case we note that in the several discussions between plaintiff’s counsel and the trial court the cause of action is sometimes referred to as a malicious abuse of process and at other times as a case of malieions prosecution. There is, of course, a wide disparity between these two causes of action and the differentiation has been pointed out in Mr. Justice Perskie’s lucid opinion…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Penwag Property Co., Inc. v. LandauNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Vickey v. NesslerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Fielder Agency v. Eldan Construction Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Lakutis v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API