Legal Opinion

Merck & Co., Inc. v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 3, 1958No. 7473_1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit upon the product claims of patent No. 2,703,302, entitled “Vitamin B12-Active Composition and Process of Preparing Same,” issued to Rickes and Wood, assignors of the plaintiff, Merck, on March 1, 1955, upon an application dated December 8, 1952 1 . The District Court held the product claims invalid, upon the grounds that they covered a “product of nature” and that there was lack of invention. Merck & Company, Inc., v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., D.C.W.D.Va., 152 F.Supp. 690.

We are not here concerned with the process claims of the patent, for they…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Cochrane v. Badische Anilin & Soda FabrikSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Parke-Davis & Co. v. H. K. Mulford Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911
  5. Florence-Mayo Nuway Co. v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Application of Joseph D. FisherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. In re BergyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. Manville Boiler Company, Incorporated v. Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, Incorporated, and Columbia Boiler Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  4. Application of Ernst Johan Jens HenriksenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  5. Revlon, Inc. v. Carson Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API