Legal Opinion

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 102OAG003

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided July 31, 2017No. 102OAG003Published

1Opinion of the Court

MUNICIPALITIES CHARTER AMENDMENT PROCESS – PREEMPTION – A MUNICIPALITY MAY NOT REQUIRE THAT ALL CHARTER AMENDMENTS GO THROUGH AN ADVISORY REFERENDUM BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY July 31, 2017 The Honorable Patrick Wojahn Mayor, City of College Park You have asked whether the Council of the City of College Park may amend the City Charter to require that all future charter amendments be subject to a non-binding referendum before the Council may vote on adopting the amendment. In keeping with our procedures for addressing local governments’ opinion requests, you provided the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mayor of Oakland v. Mayor of Mountain Lake ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Ad + Soil, Inc. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Koste v. Town of OxfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Inlet Associates v. Assateague House Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Cheeks v. Cedlair Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API