Lerwill v. Inflight Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
WOLLENBERG, District Judge.
This is an action to enforce the overtime provision of a collective bargaining agreement. The case is properly before this Court under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S. C. § 185. The parties stipulated that trial would be held on the issue of liability only. Trial was held without a jury on November 12, 1973, and both parties have submitted extensive post trial briefs.
Plaintiff seeks to recover money allegedly due as overtime pay to himself and all other employees for work…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Holden Brown, George House and George Wolff v. Sterling Aluminum Products Corporation, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Wirtz v. Malthor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Lewis v. LowryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Raymond J. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- L. Mets Lerwill, Charles M. Perry, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Employees of Inflight Motion Pictures, Inc. v. Inflight Motion Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- D'CAMERA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Heatherly v. Hilton Hawaiian Village Joint VentureHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Prendergast v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.