Legal Opinion

State ex rel. First National Bank v. Cronin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1904No. 13,664PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original application for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to deposit in relator bank its pro rata share of the county funds.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

On the 5th day of April, 1904, the relator, the First National Bank of Atkiiison, filed its application in this court against the respondent, Daniel J. Oronin, as treasurer of Holt county, praying for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to deposit in the relator hank its pro rata share of the funds of Holt county, as provided by section 18, article III, chapter 18, Compiled Statutes, 1903 (Annotated Statutes, 10870). An alternative writ was allowed, returnable May 3, 1904, and on that date the respondent filed his answer herein, by which he practically admitted the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Cleland v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Wheeler v. StuhtNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State ex rel. Comstock v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Richards v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carlton v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  2. Shambaugh v. City BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Bunch v. ShortWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Smith v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API