Legal Opinion

Stolz v. New York Central Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court which dismissed the complaints in this consolidated action without prejudice to the commencement of a new action by an administrator validly appointed as such. There is also an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to amend the order and judgment dismissing the complaints. This motion was apparently made to avoid the Statute of Limitations by keeping the cases alive so that another personal representative of the decedent could be appointed and substituted for the plaintiff.

Decedent was employed by the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Johnson v. . Phoenix Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Van Der Stegen v. Neuss, Hesslein & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Lapiedra v. American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Whiting v. . GlassNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bartel v. Farrell LinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  2. Bartel v. Farrell LinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  3. Bartel v. Maersk Line, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. Bartel v. Maersk Line, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API