Legal Opinion
Marbly v. Home Properties of New York
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 10, 2002No. 2:01-cv-70719PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
STEEH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Joseph Marbly, appearing pro se, moves for summary judgment as to his claims that his landlord defendant Home Properties of New York (“HPNY”) is liable under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1982, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 (“FHA”), for violating his civil rights by disproportionately raising his rent under a renewed lease, and denying him rental repairs and maintenance, all on the basis of plaintiffs African-American race. The facts and legal arguments presented in the parties’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lavaughn Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dwonzyk v. Baltimore CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004