Bloodworth v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of selling heroin and appeals to this court. Held:
l.The court charged the jury: "Now, the offense charged in this indictment is a violation of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act, and this Act provides in part as follows — that it shall be unlawful for any person to manufacture, possess, have under his control, sell, prescribe, administer, dispense or compound any narcotic drug except as authorized in this chapter. In that connection I charge you that heroin is a narcotic drug within the meaning of that Act, and I charge you…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kitchens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Morton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Vaughn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Bloodworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Nix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Montford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Kelley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.