Bloodworth v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
1. The defendant was indicted in three counts for selling heroin, each count referring to a different day and different transaction, and each reciting "the date herein alleged being a material averment as to this count.” He was acquitted on the first count, convicted on Counts 2 and 3 and sentenced to two terms to be served consecutively. He maintains that, the sales being near in time and to the same person, he should be punished, if at all, by only one sentence. Such, however, is not the case. The rule is generally that time is not of the essence, and that on a general…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gravitt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Morton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ledesma v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Maner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Bloodworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.