Legal Opinion

Bank Josephine v. Conn

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 16, 1980PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the appellees, defendants below, in an action to secure a deficiency judgment. KRS 355.9-504. The issues are whether the trial court erred: (1) in failing to direct a verdict for the appellant; and (2) in admitting into evidence certain expert testimony.

In April of 1977, the appellant, The Bank Josephine, instituted this action under KRS 355.9-504 against the appellees, Frankie Conn and his father, Leonard Conn, to recover a deficiency of $7,337.23. This followed default by the appellees and the subsequent sale of collateral owned by them…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tauber v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  2. Farmers Equipment Company v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. INGERSOLL-RAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MILLER MINING COMPANY, INC.; Michael Miller, Esq., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Bernard v. BausCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Pivnick v. White, Getgey & Meyer Co., LPACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Poti Holding Co., Inc. v. PiggottMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API