Legal Opinion

Hindquarter Corp. v. Property Development Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1981No. 46959-8Published

1Opinion of the Court

95 Wn.2d 809 (1981)

631 P.2d 923

HINDQUARTER CORPORATION, Respondent,

v.

PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, LLOYD DUBOIS, ET AL, Respondents.

No. 46959-8.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 23, 1981.

Eric Richter, John A. Roberts, and Skeel, Henke, Evenson & Roberts, for petitioner.

Allen Lane Carr, for respondent.

UTTER, J.

Hindquarter Corporation sought a declaratory judgment establishing its right to exercise a lease renewal option. The trial court ruled that since Hindquarter had often been late in making its rental payments, Hindquarter's option was unenforceable. Finding…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pannell v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Nork v. Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Streicher v. HeimburgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Lutterloh v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API