Legal Opinion
Krodel v. Young
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 8, 1983No. Civ. A. 80-3183PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FLANNERY, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on plaintiffs petition for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in pursuing his age discrimination case in this court. Plaintiff claims that he is entitled to this award as a successful plaintiff under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Defendant argues that plaintiff is not entitled to attorneys’ fees under this act, or any other.
FACTS
Plaintiff is a management analyst employed in the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Social Security Administration, Department of Health and Human…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Krodel v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Watkins v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. O & G Spring and Wire Forms Specialty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Julie Goos v. National Association of RealtorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Donald J. KOSSMAN and Warren Jodar, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CALUMET COUNTY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.