Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided August 2, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00795Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, Plaintiffs, Case No. 20-cv-0795-SPM v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., EVANSVILLE WESTERN RAILWAY, INC., and PADUCAH & LOUISVILLE RAILWAY, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER McGLYNN, District Judge: Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss plaintiff’s second amended complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Defendant, Paducah and Louisville Railway, Inc. (“PAL”) (Doc. 139). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API