Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Lopes

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1999No. 960551Published

1DissentRusson, Justice

¶24 I dissent. In my opinion, the gang enhancement statute is simply a sentencing statute. It does not create a separate offense with a separate penalty, nor does it add elements to the underlying offense. Rather, it merely enhances the minimum sentence for the underlying offense once the accused has been found guilty of that offense; the maximum sentence remains the same regardless of whether the enhancement applies. In fact, the statute specifically states, “This section does not create any separate offense but provides an enhanced penalty for the primary offense.” Utah Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. AlvarezUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. AngusUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Padilla v. Utah Bd. of Pardons and ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. ComishUtah Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API