Legal Opinion

Fout v. Hanlin

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1933No. CC 477PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, PeesideNT:

This suit is prosecuted under Code 1931, 42-1-9, to establish who are the heirs of Gabriel S. Kitzmiller, deceased, who died in May, 1932. It is averred by the petitioners, Richard L. Fout and Joseph W. Fout, that they are the sons of said decedent by a common law marriage between him and their mother, Hattie Fout. The defendants are collateral kindred of said decedent. The trial chancellor sustained their demurrer to the petition as amended, and certified his ruling to this Court for review.

Petitioners allege that in the year 1886, Hattie Fout, their mother, then about…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Huard v. McTeighOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Kester v. KesterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. In Re Estate of ShippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Miller v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Jackson v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pickens v. O'HaraWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. McClaugherty v. McClaughertySupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  3. State v. BraggWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  5. Luther v. LutherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API