Legal Opinion
Leist v. Tugendhaft
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 21, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a purported contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated April 16, 2009, as granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and vacate the notice of pendency.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, for specific performance of a purported contract for the sale of real prop*688erty and filed a notice of pendency against the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stevens v. Publicis S.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Williamson v. DelsenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Urgo v. PatelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Friedman v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Papakostas v. HarkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 42nd Avenue Commons, LLC v. Barracuda, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Titte v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Preston v. NicholsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023