Legal Opinion

Friedman v. New York Telephone Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

Plaintiffs, as purchasers of real estate in Poughkeepsie, N. Y., brought action against the defendant, the vendor, to recover damages for fraudulent representations made to them by the vendor’s broker at the time of the purchase, concerning the condition of the heating and plumbing system of the building. No doubt arises as to the nature of the broker’s employment. He was, in writing, “ authorized to enter into negotiations with prospective purchasers for the sale of our property located at #9 Cannon St. in the City of Poughkeepsie, N. Y.” The broker had no authority to sell and convey the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mott v. . Consumers' Ice CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Bennett v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Krumm v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Fairchild v. . McMahonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Dudley v. . PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Loma Vista Development Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Thrams v. BlockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  3. De Roche v. DameAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Dickson v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Montague v. Bank for SavingsNew York Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API