Legal Opinion

Sanger v. Rothschild

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case submitted on agreed statement.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

William Rothschild, who was then unmarried, in 1874 became a member of the Independent Order of Free Sons of Israel, which was *795a Mutual Benefit Aid Association, organized and existing under the laws of the state of New York. By its constitution or by-laws it obligated itself to pay the sum of $1,000 on the decease of a member. Eothschild, in September, 1881, made the following designation for the payment of this sum of $1,000.

“I, the undersigned, member of the Standard Lodge No. 30 I. O. F. S. of I., do hereby declare, of my own free will, that the money, according to the endowment law of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hellenberg v. District Number One of the Independent Order of BerithNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Presbyterian Mutual Assurance Fund v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Kentucky Masonic Mutual Life Ins. v. Miller's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
  4. Highland v. HighlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Duvall v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. Knights of Golden RuleU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1891
  2. Sabin v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United WorkmenNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Thomas v. ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Zenger v. Cigarmakers' Union No. 224Utah Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API