Legal Opinion

White v. Ruth R. Millington Living Trust

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1990No. 16260PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

The plaintiffs by Count I seek a declaration they have acquired an easement for ingress and egress by prescription. By Count II, in the alternative, they seek the establishment of a private road of necessity under § 228.340. The defendant tendered to the plaintiffs an easement in the south eighteen feet of her property for the construction of a road. The judgment of the trial court declared the plaintiffs shall be entitled to the tendered easement and denied relief upon the petition. The plaintiffs appeal.

The following is a summary of the facts. The plaintiffs’ tract is the south…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Boyce v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. McIlroy v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Carpenter-Union Hills Cemetery Ass'n v. Camp Zoe, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Beldner v. General Electric CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whittom v. Alexander-Richardson PartnershipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Harmon v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Shapiro Bros., Inc. v. Jones-Festus Properties, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Moss v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Gault v. BahmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API