White v. Ruth R. Millington Living Trust
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Judge.
The plaintiffs by Count I seek a declaration they have acquired an easement for ingress and egress by prescription. By Count II, in the alternative, they seek the establishment of a private road of necessity under § 228.340. The defendant tendered to the plaintiffs an easement in the south eighteen feet of her property for the construction of a road. The judgment of the trial court declared the plaintiffs shall be entitled to the tendered easement and denied relief upon the petition. The plaintiffs appeal.
The following is a summary of the facts. The plaintiffs’ tract is the south…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Boyce v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- McIlroy v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Carpenter-Union Hills Cemetery Ass'n v. Camp Zoe, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Beldner v. General Electric CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Whittom v. Alexander-Richardson PartnershipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Harmon v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Shapiro Bros., Inc. v. Jones-Festus Properties, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Moss v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Gault v. BahmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.