Legal Opinion

Arianna Blanche v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 2, 2016No. 15-1868PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Arianna Blanche (“Arianna”), by her mother and guardian Latoya. Blanche (“Latoya”), filed suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) for injuries that Arianna sustained during birth. The United States moved for summary judgment, arguing that Arianna’s claims were not timely under the FTCA’s statute of limitations. The district court granted the motion, and Arianna appealed. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

While Latoya was pregnant with Arian-na, she received her prenatal care at the Will County Community Health Center…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Santos Ex Rel. Beato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Credit Suisse Securities (Usa) LLC v. SimmondsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Louise Drazan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Watkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Apostolos Xanthopoulos v. LABRCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Sparre v. U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. P.W. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  5. Anna Chronis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API