Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anna Chronis v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 29, 2019No. 17-3093Published

1DissentRovner, Circuit Judge

Our circuit applies a flexible standard to the exhaustion requirements for plaintiffs making claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, excusing technical deficiencies so as not to preclude all but the savviest of plaintiffs from receiving a hearing on the merits. See Delgado v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. , 880 F.3d 913, 924 (7th Cir. 2018), as amended on denial of reh'g and reh'g en banc (June 19, 2018). The majority's decision demands far more of Chronis than our precedent requires.

Chronis, a pro se plaintiff, knew little about the complicated legal world of suing the federal government. She was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Bobby J. Anderson v. Alfred HardmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Simeon Palay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Smoke Shop, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API