Legal Opinion

Rudick v. State Board of Optometry

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 2019No. A152179Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 10/11/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ANTHONY RUDICK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A152179 v. STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG13708526) Defendant and Respondent. This is an appeal from judgment after the trial court denied the petition for writ of mandate filed by plaintiffs Anthony Rudick, O.D., and Ridge Eye Care, Inc. (Ridge) and granted summary judgment in favor of defendant State Board of Optometry (Board) and against plaintiffs on their related complaint for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Rich v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API