Legal Opinion

Headington v. Central Building Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1935No. 31,788PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action for personal injuries. Judgment was for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff was employed in an office on the ninth floor of an office building owned and operated by defendant. The floor in the hallway on this floor of the building is made of a substance known as terrazo. It is made by putting a mixture of cement and marble chips on the floor and then rolling and grinding it down until it has a smooth surface.

On the night of the 12th or 13th of August, 1931, defendant put a new wax on this floor. On the 14th of August…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Topeka v. MartineauSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  2. Tedens v. Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. State v. HensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. City of Junction City v. BladesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
  5. Seininski v. Wilmington Leather Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Rex Worrall & Canyon Hotels, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Walker v. KressSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Kansas State Highway Commission v. RoepkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Kansas State Highway Commission v. RoepkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API