Legal Opinion

Island Mill Lumber Co. v. City of Alpena

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1913No. Docket No. 128PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Alpena; Emerick, J. Assumpsit by the Island Mill Lumber Company against the city of Alpena for the recovery of taxes paid under protest. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

Plaintiff, a Michigan corporation owning property and engaged in the lumber business in the city of Alpena, brought this action against said city to recover back an amount of taxes paid under duress and protest, claiming that the same had been fraudulently assessed by reason of intentional overvaluation of the property upon which the taxes were levied. The case was tried before a jury in the circuit court of Alpena county on September 17, 1912, and at the conclusion of the evidence the court directed a verdict for defendant on the ground that the testimony produced by plaintiff was not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pioneer Iron Co. v. City of NegauneeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of Muskegon v. BoyceMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Henneberger v. MatterMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kingsford Chemical Co. v. City of KingsfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Weir v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. NeBoShone Ass'n v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Copper Range Co. v. Adams TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Zimmerman v. FeldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API