Legal Opinion

Kingsford Chemical Co. v. City of Kingsford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1956No. Docket 10, Calendar 46,671PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiff seeks the recovery of $36,-515.62, city taxes paid under protest to the defendant city. Plaintiff claims in this action of assumpsit that it was intentionally overassessed and discriminated against and that its properties were assessed at a higher rate than other properties upon the assessment rolls. A jury rejected plaintiff’s claim, and motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and motion for new trial were denied. Plaintiff appeals.

In 1951 Ford Motor Company abandoned further operations of its Kingsford plant, and on December 17th of that year it sold the plant in its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Rowley v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Merrill v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Twenty-Two Charlotte, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dutcher v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Fisher-New Center Co. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In Re Appeal of General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Pavilion Apartments, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Fisher-New Center Co. v. DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API