A Minor v. Juvenile Department Fourth Judicial District Court
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
2Per curiam
In A Minor v. Juvenile Department, 96 Nev. 332, 608 P.2d 509 (1980), we held that the accomplice corroboration rule was applicable to juvenile delinquency proceedings. Rehearing was granted for the limited purpose of deciding whether that application is foreclosed by NRS 169.025.1
*486The Legislature has dictated, by enacting NRS 169.025, that our criminal procedure statutes, such as NRS 175.291, are not required to be observed in juvenile proceedings. Manifestly, the Legislature has not forbidden their application to juvenile matters. The Legislature has declared, in NRS…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Smith v. Mitchell P.California Supreme Court · 1978
- A Minor v. Juvenile Department Fourth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1980
4Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- In the Interest of DuganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- People v. E.L.B.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re ELBCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- State v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Logan D.)Nevada Supreme Court · 2013