Legal Opinion
United States v. Jerry Pringle
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 14, 2003No. 01-14602PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Jerry Pringle challenges the district court’s denial of his pro se motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (hereinafter “motion to reduce”). We address two challenges raised by Pringle on appeal. First, Prin-gle argues that the district court erred in calculating his original sentence by taking into account acts committed by Pringle’s co-conspirators that were not “reasonably foreseeable” to Pringle in contravention of United States Sentencing Guideline § 1B1.8 (2002) (“U.S.S.G.”). Second, Prin-gle argues that, even if such acts were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Thomas Dewayne WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Vika VerbitskayaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Tony Edward DensonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- In Re RasmussenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
- American Bankers Insurance Group, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.