Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 7, 1919No. 8831PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. John A. Perry, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error contends that he has been denied due process of law. A contempt committed in the immediate presence of the court while sitting as such is a direct contempt. 13 Corpus Juris 5. A. contempt which disrespects the court or obstructs the administration of justice is a criminal contempt. Wyatt v. People, 17 Colo. 252-258, 28 Pac. 961, citing Rapalje on Contempts, Sec. 21. Where the contempt is in the immediate presence of the court, summary punishment may be inflicted without affidavit, notice, rule to show cause, or other process. 13 Corpus Juris 63.

If plaintiff in error in this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. LindsayIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Wyatt v. the PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Ludlow v. Rector, Church Wardens & Vestrymen of St. John's ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. State v. SchollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State v. DepoisterNevada Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Clark v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. Coons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Rust v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. District Attorney v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API