City & County of Denver v. Board of Assessment Appeals
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
We exercised our jurisdiction under C.A.R. 50 1 to consider whether the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA) erred in allowing persons to act as “appraisers” or “expert witnesses” and present testimony in property valuation proceedings under contingent fee agreements, contrary to section 12-61-712(l)(b), 5B C.R.S. (1991 & 1996 Supp.). In the three cases before us, two from the City and County of Denver and one from Arapahoe County (the Counties), the persons who testified in the BAA proceedings were salaried employees of appraisal firms that had executed contingent fee agreements with taxpayer…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fogg v. MacAlusoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Gerrity Oil & Gas Corp. v. MagnessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Colorado Ground Water Commission v. Eagle Peak Farms, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Dallas Creek Water Co. v. HueySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Mountain City Meat Co. v. OquedaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Buckley Powder Co. v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Marks v. GesslerColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Just in Case Business Lighthouse, LLC v. MurrayColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- FirstBank-Longmont v. Board of EqualizationColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Berger v. City of BoulderColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.