Legal Opinion

State v. Chavis-Tucker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 2014No. 14AP-40PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Chavis-Tucker,

2014-Ohio-3050.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 14AP-40 v. : (C.P.C. No. 95CR-09-1021) James Chavis-Tucker, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on July 10, 2014 Ron O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, and Seth L. Gilbert, for appellee. James Chavis-Tucker, pro se. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas KLATT, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, James Chavis-Tucker, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion for a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. MoncriefOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. Townsend, 08ap-371 (12-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. Bush, 08ap-627 (2-3-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. Carson, 07ap-492 (11-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Hoover-MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. PippinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API