Holsworth v. Czeschin
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOUNG, Justice.
In this case, appellants Thomas E. Hols-worth, Mason Holsworth, and Joe P. Cantu challenge a decision by the trial court that appellee Don Czesehin, as an employee of their business, was entitled to back wages, car allowance and attorney’s fees. Trial was ->to the court without a jury. After judgment was rendered, the trial court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law under Rule 296, T.R.C.P. We affirm.
A review of the evidence discloses that in 1975, Joe Cantu, Thomas Holsworth, and Mason Holsworth became partners in Texas Mercantile, a business which imported…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Espinoza v. Victoria Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Knopf v. Standard Fixtures Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Purvis Oil Corp. v. Hillin, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
- Alford v. Johnston, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
- Ross v. 3D Tower Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Cap Rock Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
- First National Acceptance Co. v. Bishop, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.