Legal Opinion

Holsworth v. Czeschin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1982No. 1892PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

In this case, appellants Thomas E. Hols-worth, Mason Holsworth, and Joe P. Cantu challenge a decision by the trial court that appellee Don Czesehin, as an employee of their business, was entitled to back wages, car allowance and attorney’s fees. Trial was ->to the court without a jury. After judgment was rendered, the trial court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law under Rule 296, T.R.C.P. We affirm.

A review of the evidence discloses that in 1975, Joe Cantu, Thomas Holsworth, and Mason Holsworth became partners in Texas Mercantile, a business which imported…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Espinoza v. Victoria Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Knopf v. Standard Fixtures Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Purvis Oil Corp. v. Hillin, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  2. Alford v. Johnston, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
  3. Ross v. 3D Tower Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Cap Rock Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  5. First National Acceptance Co. v. Bishop, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API