Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Grotzner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1936No. Appeal, 458PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

Appellant was charged in an indictment containing six counts, with larceny and fraudulent conversion. She was tried by a judge sitting without a jury, found guilty, and from the sentence imposed has taken this appeal.

Appellant was employed as a bookkeeper by the grocery firm of Blumenthal and Hayman from May 1, 1928 until February 21, 1936. From June 28, 1934 to January 3,1936 she is alleged to have taken and appropriated to her own use various sums of money. During the period when these sums were taken, Mary Swoyer, who was employed as cashier, received the moneys taken…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BerneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Caffery v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Darlington v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  4. Pinkerton's National Detective Agency v. Rosedale Silk Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RobertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Commonwealth v. KramerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Kemmerer v. Troxel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API