Darlington v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Eeros to the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County. Assumpsit.
1Opinion of the Court
*196The facts of the case fully appear in the opinion of the court by
Black, J.
Taylor was a merchant who furnished raw material to Dixon, a cotton manufacturer, and took his finished fabrics for sale, charging him with the one, and accounting for the other. The faptory which Dixon worked was leased to him by Darlington, who alleges that Taylor promised, with the consent of Dixon, to pay the rent, and to enforce that promise, this suit is brought. The defence (which was made out to the satisfaction of the court and jury) is, that Taylor had no money of Dixon’s in his hands with which he could pay…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Pickel v. St. Louis Chamber of Commerce Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
- McKinster v. HitchcookNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- State v. ParishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Commonwealth v. GrotznerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Kemmerer v. Troxel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.