Legal Opinion
State v. Ray
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 21, 1986No. B66-078; CA A34281PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals his conviction for harassment under ORS 166.065(1)(e), which provides:
“(1) A person commits the crime of harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person, the actor:
U* * * * *
“(e) Subjects another to alarm or annoyance by telephonic use of obscenities or description of sexual excitement or sadomasochistic abuse or sexual conduct as defined in ORS 167.060 including intercourse, masturbation, cunnilingus, fellatio, or analingus, which use or description is patently offensive and otherwise obscene as defined in ORS 167.087(2) (b) and (c) * * *. ”
The complaint…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. EaringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. MeierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1987