Legal Opinion

State v. Ray

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 21, 1986No. B66-078; CA A34281PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his conviction for harassment under ORS 166.065(1)(e), which provides:

“(1) A person commits the crime of harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person, the actor:

U* * * * *

“(e) Subjects another to alarm or annoyance by telephonic use of obscenities or description of sexual excitement or sadomasochistic abuse or sexual conduct as defined in ORS 167.060 including intercourse, masturbation, cunnilingus, fellatio, or analingus, which use or description is patently offensive and otherwise obscene as defined in ORS 167.087(2) (b) and (c) * * *. ”

The complaint…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EaringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State v. MeierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API