Legal Opinion

State v. Ray

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1987No. CC B66-078; CA A34281; SC S32986Published

1Opinion of the Court

733 P.2d 28 (1987)

302 Or. 595

STATE of Oregon, Petitioner On Review,

v.

Ronald Gilbert RAY, Respondent On Review.

CC B66-078; CA A34281; SC S32986.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted October 8, 1986.

Decided February 10, 1987.

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Asst. Sol. Gen., Salem, filed the petition for review.

Timothy J. Sercombe, of Harrang, Swanson, Long & Watkinson, Eugene, and Rex Armstrong, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review.

Be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API