Ayoub v. Gue
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROVER, Chief Judge.
This appeal is taken from the denial of a motion to vacate a default judgment. The question presented is whether the procedural requirements are met when information sought by a motion for more definite statement is furnished the movant in the form of a letter.
The facts are these: Plaintiffs brought suit for damages alleging breach of contract. After service of the complaint, defendant filed a motion for more definite statement under the provisions of Municipal Court Civil Rule 12(e).1 Although filed a few days late, the court granted the motion and made the following entry:
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Manos v. FickenscherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Fort Stevens Pharmacy, Inc. v. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956