Legal Opinion
Fort Stevens Pharmacy, Inc. v. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 2, 1956No. 1846PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
This appeal is from the denial of a motion to vacate a default judgment against a garnishee and quash the writ of attachment issued thereon.
Appellee, hereafter called Hollywood, having secured a judgment against one Dudley, caused to be issued a writ of attachment arid garnishment' against appellant, hereafter called Fort Stevens. In answer to the garnishment Fort Stevens stated that Dudley was employed by it at a weekly salary of $45, but that Dudley was indebted to it in the sum of $80 and therefore nothing was due Dudley. Approximately a week later Hollywood issued…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Campbell v. WillisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
- Allen v. TrivettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Ellison v. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co. of Newark v. FlynnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Columbia Finance Company v. WorthyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Waxler v. LevinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Lee v. Henry J. Robb, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- McQuater v. Aetna Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Ayoub v. GueDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959