Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Slattery

California Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1912No. Crim. No. 1729PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Chief of Police of the City of Oakland. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The undisputed facts shown by the petitioner are that on the twenty-fourth day of April, 1911, he was adjudged guilty and sentenced by the police court of the city of Oakland to six months in the city prison of the city of Oakland; that the execution of his sentence was stayed by order of the court withholding the issuance of the commitment. Petitioner was allowed his liberty. He enjoyed his liberty until the thirteenth day of December, 1911, when he was again arrested and charged with drunkenness and a commitment was issued upon the judgment pronounced upon April 24, 1911, by virtue of which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In Re HerronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. People v. WallachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. State ex rel. Tingstad v. StarwichWashington Supreme Court · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API