Legal Opinion
Hippensteel v. Karol
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 1973No. 3-373A26PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I
STATEMENT ON THE APPEAL
Staton, J.
Dr. Karol sold Dr. Hippensteel unregistered securities in a Costa Rican sugar refining corporation. Five (5) Six Thousand Dollar ($6,000.00) units were sold. Each unit consisted of a share of stock and a debenture. Dr. Karol had made eight other sales to different purchasers totalling One Hundred Eight Thousand Dollars ($108,000.00). Dr. Hippensteel brought an action to recover the purchase price, interest and attorney’s fees. Besides common law fraud, his complaint alleged violation of the fraudulent practices and registration provisions of the Indiana…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Hiatt v. YerginIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Company v. SchnuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Engelbrecht v. Property Developers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Columbia Realty Corporation v. HarrelsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kruse, Kruse & Miklosko, Inc. v. BeedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Flynn v. KlinemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Monarch Beverage Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1992
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,771 Larosa Building Corporation v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Theye v. BatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.