Legal Opinion

Amato v. Latter & Blum, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 21, 1955No. 41850Published

1Opinion of the Court

79 So.2d 873 (1955)

227 La. 537

Joseph L. AMATO

v.

LATTER & BLUM, Inc. and Lawrence Teijelo.

No. 41850.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 21, 1955.

Rehearing Denied April 25, 1955.

William C. Crais, III, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Rivet & Blum, Adrian G. Duplantier, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.

MOISE, Justice.

This is an appeal by Joseph L. Amato from a judgment sustaining an exception of no right or cause of action.

On a consideration of the petition, the Court must take as true, for the purposes of the exception, all well pleaded allegations, but we are not bound to accept the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. SigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Breaux v. LairdSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  5. Zichlin v. DillSupreme Court of Florida · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API