Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1972No. 7227SC494PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Defendant first assigns as error the denial of his pretrial motions. We do not feel it necessary to discuss each of the numerous motions filed by defendant. They were, for the most part, entirely frivolous and without merit. We have, nevertheless, reviewed each motion and the trial court’s ruling in each case. We find no error in the denial of defendant’s pretrial motions.

The defendant’s second assignment of error is to the admission of hearsay evidence on the voir dire examination. Defendant contends that it was error for the court to admit the testimony of Officer Howard…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State v. HoyleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KistleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. AaronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Brooks v. BlackledgeDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API