Shaneberger v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ADAMS, District Judge.
Petitioner Richard Shaneberger appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Shaneberger contends that the district court erred when it found that he failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. We affirm.
7. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On December 11,1996, Shaneberger was convicted of felony murder, aiding and abetting armed robbery, conspiracy to commit armed robbery, and aiding and abetting kidnapping. Prior to his conviction, Shaneberger moved to suppress oral statements that he made…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Steven Moss v. Gary MiniardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- George Burger v. Jeffrey WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Robert Dennis v. Michael BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Samantha Bachynski v. Anthony StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Matthews v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.