Legal Opinion

People v. Howard

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1984No. Crim. 23091PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

Does a reconciliation by a husband and wife cancel a child custody order which had been granted as part of an interlocutory decree of dissolution?

I

In July 1978, after six years of marriage, Gene and Pamela Howard obtained an interlocutory judgment of dissolution, which gave Pamela custody of the couple’s two children. Gene was given visitation rights under the decree.

One month later, Gene moved back in with Pamela and their two children, and continued living with them for almost two years. During this period, Pamela and Gene resumed marital relations, and signed rental,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. BeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Olson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. In Re Marriage of ModnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GreverAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1989
  2. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. Portilla CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API