Richard B. Kay v. New Hampshire Democratic Party
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
To make a long story — already well told by the district court — short, appellant complains that his rights were violated when he was denied permission to speak at a presidential candidates’ forum and was arrested after he refused to leave the speakers’ platform. The district court dismissed the civil rights claims filed against the New Hampshire Democratic Party and two of its officials (“Party defendants”), 1 and it is this curtailment of his lawsuit and the court's refusal to allow an amended complaint that are the bases for appellant’s appeal. 2
We find no error in the district court’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Republican Party of Texas v. DietzTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Calderon-Serra v. Wilimington Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Executive Leasing Corp. v. Banco Popular De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Nikitine v. Wilmington Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Kader v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.