Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Marich v. Knox County Department of Human Services/Children Services Unit

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1989No. 88-1899Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWright, J.

I agree with the majority that a petition for a writ of habeas corpus may be an appropriate avenue to contest the validity of a permanent surrender agreement. This court has implicitly held that invalid consent to a surrender agreement is a jurisdictional defect, allowing a writ of habeas corpus to issue. R.C. 2725.05; see, e.g., Manning v. Miami Cty. Children’s Services Bd. (1985), 18 Ohio St. 3d 211, 18 OBR 273, 480 N.E. 2d 770. Moreover, the writ should not automatically be denied in a case such as this on the ground that the petitioner has an adequate remedy at law.3 *168However, I find the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re HuntOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In re Writ of Habeas Corpus for MalloryOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State ex rel. Ohio State Racing Commission v. WaltonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Manning v. Miami County Children's Services BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API