Legal Opinion

Rose v. A.C. & S., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1986No. Nos. 85-3778, 85-3819PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a product liability suit against various manufacturers and sellers of asbestos-containing insulation products. Dorothy Marry Rose, widow and personal representative of Albert Marry, who died of asbestosis in April 1976, appeals from the district court’s summary judgment dismissing her wrongful death and survival actions as time barred by the Washington three-year statute of limitations. She contends that Washington’s discovery rule extends the statutory period so that her claim, filed in October 1980, is not time barred. We agree that summary judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Armstrong v. McalpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Coto Settlement v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. ASARCO Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. In Re Hawaii Federal Asbestos CasesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API