Legal Opinion

Renick v. Hays

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 30, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge -Clarke

Affirming.

In this action for slander, plaintiff recovered judg ment for $500.00, and defendant has appealed.

The utterance charged is, that Renick said: “John Hays has been stealing chickens from Stephens, sometimes called Teed Rector.” The answer denies the utterance, pleads its truth, and alleges that what the defendant said to plaintiff was: “You have been accused of stealing Teed Rector’s chickens, and you told me yourself you did steal them.”

The affirmative allegations of the answer were traversed of record, and, upon trial, these issues were submitted…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State, in Interest of RrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Jack Fairbanks v. Henry E. Cowan, Superintendent, Kentucky State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. State ex rel. R. R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. State v. McLellanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API