Legal Opinion

Reining v. Northern Ohio Traction Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1923No. 17578PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHIAS, J.:

1. • Although a- passenger upon a ' street car .con tinues to be a passenger until' he has accomplishec *405he act of alighting in safety, and although the com->any owes him a high degree of care so long as the elation of carrier and passenger continues, such re-ation terminates and the duty of the company as a arrier is ended when it has discharged him safely pon the street, and the company is not responsible or dangers which subsequently arise from conditions ot of its own creation.

2.It is not the duty of a conductor or. motorman 0 warn passengers upon leaving a street car at a…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Feldman v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Baier v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Ruddy v. IngebretSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. St. John v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Waldron v. Southwestern Bus Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API