Legal Opinion
Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners
California Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1943No. S. F. 16609Published
1Opinion of the Court
21 Cal.2d 790 (1943)
JOHN FRANKLIN DARE, Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents.
S. F. No. 16609.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Apr. 7, 1943.
M. Jas. McGranaghan for Appellant.
Earl Warren, Attorney General, and Thomas Coakley, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondents.
SHENK, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondents, Board of Medical Examiners and its members to cancel the order of the board revoking the petitioner's license to practice as a drugless practitioner, and to restore or re-issue his license. The petition was filed…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.